If other groups have dances, StuCo thinks no one will come to the all-school events they host. That's paranoid and greedy, and why should StuCo have exclusive rights to dances? I mean, what is this, a Rockefeller oil monopoly? Or did I miss the assembly where they announced our school was turning into a mafia labor union?
Apparently, it's "a matter of supply and demand." Well with all due respect, the fact that Snoball sucks year after year has nothing to do with supply and demand.StuCo, you guys are SO IMPORTANT and have SO MANY THINGS BESIDES DANCES TO WORRY ABOUT! It's unfair to subject the student body to your parties. It's unfair that y'all don't give the rest of us a chance to do better. But most of all, it's unfair to you. Why should you guys have all that weight on your shoulders? Let clubs and individuals host the dances instead! WHY NOT?
Just a side note. I was talking to Aishah today, and we realized that if we understand this new policy correctly -- and I hope we do, or else this is all just massively hypocritical -- StuCo is also blocking the traditional SURE dance. Good luck with that.
Pshh, that's silly. Let me know if I have to get on someone's ass from over here.
ReplyDeleteMore groups getting involved in coordinating parties and trying different things is rather healthy, be it SURE or y'all. Just make sure you can afford to lose money on whatever you do.
TOPHER!!!
ReplyDeleteemerging from the shadowy depths of college!!!!
awesome, i needed a little vindication here, seeing as i'm not getting any at school.
claire and i will probably come to you for guidance at some point in the near future :)